Monday, March 29, 2010
Saturday, March 27, 2010
I was directed to this article by a friend on facebook: Iceland: the world's most feminist country |Life and style |The Guardian
And my first thought was: wait, what?*
Did the whole sex-positive movement skip Iceland? What about the personal liberties, the government has no place in our bedroom movement? Granted, sex-workers do seem to be the world's primary target for exploitation, but I was under the (apparently mistaken) impression that we had figured out a while ago that criminalizing sex work is not the way to go, because (a) some people like it and it's really none of our business, and (b) it makes a kabillion times more sense to regulate the industry so no one is getting exploited any more (or at least as few as possible as little as possible, since no government system is perfect).
Maybe I'm biased by my respect for Canadian sex columnist Sasha, a long-time advocate of sex-positivism and sex-workers rights, but this seems like a giant mistake to me, both in terms of principle and practical effect. And yet, the media appears to think this is entirely a plus in the empowerment of women column. While I obviously support the attempt to get the government behind efforts to end the exploitation of women, I vehemently oppose the state putting limits on sexual behaviours that do not hurt anyone else. Harm principle, anyone?
I smell disaster...
More news coverage indexed here: Iceland Bans Strip Clubs; What If The U.S. Did The Same?
* As an aside, I have long toyed with the idea of creating a Twitter feed or mini blog called "Wait, What?" that just includes links to randomness which elicit that reaction from me.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Oh National Post...you never fail to bring the crazy.
George Jonas: [Obama is] Ruining America — coolly, calmly and collectedly - Full Comment
Friday, March 12, 2010
Sunday, March 07, 2010
Why is it that cough syrup tastes so incredibly heinous? Is it because they assume something that tastes like hell is less likely to become a street drug?
Or maybe it's the alcohol, menthol, D&C Red 33, FD&C Red 40, monoammonium glycyrrhizinate (which is some sort of licorice extract?), polyethylene glycol, sodium benzoate, sodium carboxymethyl-cellulose, sodium citrate, sodium cyclamate (gross!), sorbitol, or sucralose. Or the horrifying fake cherry flavor (although the Straight Dope claims there's a reason for that).
Oh, and BTW, the alcohol? I was not aware it was in there. I am allergic to alcohol (or at least as allergic as people get). And when I say alcohol allergy, I go straight from "Oh look, 0.05% fake wine" to alcohol poisoning.
Thursday, March 04, 2010
As reported by the Beeb here: BBC News - Disturbing story of Fallujah's birth defects
And more stories here: Google News
Now, it's possible--and this is certainly what's being hinted about--that there was some sort of bio-weapon used that is causing this. But I wouldn't be surprised if the regular weapons used by all sides don't have teratogenic properties.