Notwithstanding the Respondent’s insistence on deference, the Applicant submits that the question to be asked is whether the immigration officer’s decision was reasonable. Given that the decision was clearly based on a deficient analysis which misapprehended the evidence and failed to seek clarification in the face of that misapprehension, it is submitted that the decision was unreasonable.
LAWYERED!
1 comment:
calvin klein underwear
nike x off white
nike lebron 16
goyard
supreme new york
kyrie irving shoes
jordan shoes
retro jordans
kyrie 6
hogan outlet online
Post a Comment