Saturday, July 14, 2012

Excerpt: European Union Asylum Procedures Directive

European Union Asylum Procedures Directive, COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2005/85/EC, of 1 December 2005, on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, 13.12.2005 Official Journal of the European Union L 326/13 (footnotes omitted) [Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:326:0013:0034:EN:PDF]

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular point (1)(d) of the first paragraph of Article 63 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee.
Whereas:

(17) A key consideration for the well-foundedness of an asylum application is the safety of the applicant in his/her country of origin. Where a third country can be regarded as a safe country of origin, Member States should be able to designate it as safe and presume its safety for a particular applicant, unless he/she presents serious counter-indications.

(18) Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established.

(19) Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the minimum common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States should be obliged to consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country. In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list, after consultation of the European Parliament.

(20) It results from the status of Bulgaria and Romania as candidate countries for accession to the European Union and the progress made by these countries towards membership that they should be regarded as
constituting safe countries of origin for the purposes of this Directive until the date of their accession to the European Union.

(21) The designation of a third country as a safe country of origin for the purposes of this Directive cannot establish an absolute guarantee of safety for nationals of that country. By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned. For this reason, it is important that, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his/her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him/her. [emphasis added]

CHAPTER III
PROCEDURES AT FIRST INSTANCE
SECTION I
Article 23

4. Member States may also provide that an examination procedure in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II be prioritised or accelerated if:

(c) the application for asylum is considered to be unfounded:
(i) because the applicant is from a safe country of origin within the meaning of Articles 29, 30 and 31…

Article 29

[Annulled, see European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, C-133/06, European Union: European Court of Justice, 6 May 2008, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4832ddb92.html [accessed 14 July 2012]]

Minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin

1. The Council shall, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, adopt a minimum common list of third countries which shall be regarded by Member States as safe countries of origin in accordance with Annex II.

2. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II. The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council or by a Member State to submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.

3. When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.

4. Where the Council requests the Commission to submit a proposal for removing a third country from the minimum common list, the obligation of Member States pursuant to Article 31(2) shall be suspended with regard to this third country as of the day following the Council decision requesting such a submission.

5. Where a Member State requests the Commission to submit a proposal to the Council for removing a third country from the minimum common list, that Member State shall notify the Council in writing of the request made to the Commission. The obligation of this Member State pursuant to Article 31(2) shall be suspended with regard to the third country as of the day following the notification to the Council.

6. The European Parliament shall be informed of the suspensions under paragraphs 4 and 5.

7. The suspensions under paragraphs 4 and 5 shall end after three months, unless the Commission makes a proposal before the end of this period, to withdraw the third country from the minimum common list. The suspensions shall in any case end where the Council rejects a proposal by the Commission to withdraw the third country from the list.

8. Upon request by the Council, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on whether the situation of a country on the minimum common list is still in conformity with Annex II. When presenting its report, the Commission may make such recommendations or proposals as it deems appropriate.

Article 30

National designation of third countries as safe countries of origin

1. Without prejudice to Article 29, Member States may retain or introduce legislation that allows, in accordance with Annex II, for the national designation of third countries other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum. This may include designation of part of a country as safe where the conditions in Annex II are fulfilled in relation to that part.

2. By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may retain legislation in force on 1 December 2005 that allows for the national designation of third countries, other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum where they are satisfied that persons in the third countries concerned are generally neither subject to:

(a) persecution as defined in Article 9 of Directive 2004/83/EC; nor

(b) torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. [emphasis added]

3. Member States may also retain legislation in force on 1 December 2005 that allows for the national designation of part of a country as safe, or a country or part of a country as safe for a specified group of persons in that country, where the conditions in paragraph 2 are fulfilled in relation to that part or group.

4. In assessing whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, Member States shall have regard to the legal situation, the application of the law and the general political circumstances in the third country concerned. [emphasis added]

5. The assessment of whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with this Article shall be based on a range of sources of information, including in particular information from other Member States, the UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.

6. Member States shall notify to the Commission the countries that are designated as safe countries of origin in accordance with this Article.

Article 31

The safe country of origin concept

1. A third country designated as a safe country of origin in accordance with either Article 29 or 30 may, after an individual examination of the application, be considered as a safe country of origin for a particular applicant for asylum only if:

(a) he/she has the nationality of that country; or

(b) he/she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country;

and he/she has not submitted any serious grounds for considering the country not to be a safe country of origin in his/her particular circumstances and in terms of his/her qualification as a refugee in accordance with Directive 2004/83/EC.

2. Member States shall, in accordance with paragraph 1, consider the application for asylum as unfounded where the third country is designated as safe pursuant to Article 29.

3. Member States shall lay down in national legislation further rules and modalities for the application of the safe country of origin concept.

ANNEX II

Designation of safe countries of origin for the purposes of Articles 29 and 30(1)

A country is considered as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of the law within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is generally and consistently no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Directive 2004/83/EC, no torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and no threat by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict.

In making this assessment, account shall be taken, inter alia, of the extent to which protection is provided against persecution or mistreatment by:

(a) the relevant laws and regulations of the country and the manner in which they are applied;

(b) observance of the rights and freedoms laid down in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and/or the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights and/or the Convention against Torture, in particular the rights from which derogation cannot be made under Article 15(2) of the said European Convention;

(c) respect of the non-refoulement principle according to the Geneva Convention;

(d) provision for a system of effective remedies against violations of these rights and freedoms.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

It has beсome a vital part of intеrnet presence
manаgement for branding businеsѕ and engagement with your fans.
All yοu havе tο add thе expenses maԁe
on stationery, transpoгt and ԁelivery costs, reρairs and maintenance,
testing, іnfгastructure sеrviсeѕ and back-office serviceѕ.

Uѕes analytiсѕ to examine thе сountry's progress on its deficit reduction plans.

Also visit my blog post; Sociologuesdusuperieur.Org

Anonymous said...

Since more than 90% people use Google for web searches it is but obvious that the person is searching for. By doing this, but that's all they do. With us you can hire Dedicated Website Promotion experts for a complete Website Promotion requirement. Pay per click campaigns play a very crucial part in online marketing. We have learned through internet and online promotions. It can also help to prevent such maneuvers.

Also visit my homepage: http://izipedia.com

Anonymous said...

What about pregnancy Here are some tips for how
to incorporate the paleo into your daily life. The Exome Sequencing
Project reported. Dear Readers, Today's edition of paleo Q & A. Used in soups, stews and vegetables. Wouldn't you like to
be healthier if you cut out peanuts and cashews.
Many of us have grown up eating the wrong foods. This recipe is acceptably to use
for cooking, all food was eaten raw.

Feel free to surf to my web-site - paleo diet by robb wolf

Anonymous said...

Consistency - It is extremely important in ecology
and without these spell to get him back, the terrestrial ecosystem may be vastly disturbed.
All our spell to get him back and our ability to choose
our response.

My page ex boyfriend

Anonymous said...

Quick Poll Whose version of 'cod black ops xbox 360' do you prefer?
Prior to enlisting, Crump was also a keen gamer.

Also visit my site Metal guear solid

Anonymous said...

After Amphy is cured, Jasmine may be battled and captured.
Being full dark or light side will naturally make you more or less liked by certain party members
to like you. In fact, there are many platforms offering many kinds of free online create video game, cool science
fairprojects, interesting quizzes, fun facts, amazing video and so on.
However, you don't have to agree with the results?

Also visit my blog post ... web page

Anonymous said...

The interior auto detailing services. It has an ECVT transmission and the mileage is 51/48 city and on highway.

Fiat Palio stileFiat Palio Stile introduces to the world
a unique blend of Italian Design and Revolutionary Engine Technology with its soft, simple and dynamic.



Here is my web blog - use car